Aircooled VW South Africa

...spare the girlz whose not particularly into tits, you know?! (but gerhard sure njoys the seat cover sections! )

ZeroAxe wrote:porn/tits/nipples altogether!? Create a "sister site" with the add revenue you get for the site. http://www.aircooledvwsa-porn.co.za "

Zero your link doesn't work

I'd like to bump this thread up.

Can we please keep pussy pictures out of respectable threads? I browse the site at work and at home and if you open up a thread which purports to be selling Porsche wheels, instead of Porsche wheels the first pictures that load are "cookie cutters" of a different sort. It can lead to a few awkward moments - That is soft porn 456!

There is a huge difference between Cameron Diaz in a bikini and pictures showing the clefts of lady bits.

If you feel that you have to post such porn, surely posting in the seatcovers section would be a satisfactory alternative instead of hijacking respectful threads?

Just my 2 cents.

Thanks fo that Blitz....!

WTF!! I don't understand???
Where is the porn in a clothed woman? Nothing see through! Yes the clothing was tight but the that's all and all of them were dressed! So where is the porn?

Come on dude!! This is not Soft Porn!!!



And we do not stay in the Nanny State of the UK!!!

vader wrote:And we do not stay in the Nanny State of the UK!!!

Damn right vader. However, in your righteous indignation you have failed to notice that nobody is telling you what you can or can't do, but a lot of people on this thread have ASKED POLITELY that people don't post porn outside the seatcovers forum, and have given a number of valid reasons.

Not everyone shares your definition of what constitutes porn and this is not the place to argue that topic. The issue here is not one of nannying or censorship, but of respecting others enough not to take actions that will have a negative effect on others. This is an ACVW site, not a porn site. I'm sure no one here gives a damn about you jerking yourself off until your dick blisters at all the porn you've collected on your hard drive, we just don't want you to share it with us.

Do you really think there would be anything more to see of the Hot Wheels babe if she took her clothes off?

If you want to share your collection of sexually explicit images then join a porn chat site. This is not the place.

........waits expectantly for Vader's typical irrational, belligerent or childish response to some pretty logical and compounding arguments......not.
didn't take long did it. Sure there'll be more coming.....

Ho Hum.....Don't think we'll be needing the popcorn for this one.

Might want to have that addiction looked at.

BWHAHAHAHA.....

At least this way I give you something to go to church for....To either pray for that sexual deviant Vader and to pray for forgiveness at seeing a fully clothed woman and thinking that it is porn.... Forgive me father cause I have a small mind and a huge ego....

Sorry I only jerk off to pictures of your wife.....

Um, by definition, nowhere does it stipulate that "porn" involves undressed subjects. In fact, quite the contrary. Read it.

I think the issue is people frequenting the site want security in knowing they can browse freely with no risk of being caught with a suggestive image on screen.

I, on the other hand, get paid to zoom into 200% on such images and retouch the most suggestive parts of the human anatomy in full colour so no one here would question the "Hotwheels Chick" being on my screen. Having said that, have a highly respected female editor burst into the office asking for assistance on an image they are frantically pointing to on their server on your screen and know the embarrassment when we both end up staring at some chicks bikini line that I'm busy photoshopping...

I think it boils down to tact. Oh, and respect for others.

If it's controversial enough to stir up this sort of debate, rather treat the source of the issue by posting suggestive material into the thread we have all been graciously given that dictates such material.

vader wrote:WTF!! I don't understand???
Where is the porn in a clothed woman? Nothing see through! Yes the clothing was tight but the that's all and all of them were dressed! So where is the porn?

Come on dude!! This is not Soft Porn!!!

camel_toe3.jpg

And we do not stay in the Nanny State of the UK!!!

And what about this picture vader? Tell me that this is not soft porn?

Edit: Pic removed.

Yeah guys I must admit I have been enjoying the pics, but yes not in the for sale section. I dont have no issues with the pics, actually it shows the beauty of creation but lets keep it in seatcovers, I mean I dont want to banned from using the internet at work, also dont want to be fired for it and lastly dont want my wife banning me from the internet, I will then have to revert back to playboy and hustler and that is a no no no....

Serious guys, lets respect each other and keep "dirty" pics for seat covers.....at least that is expected so we wont visit when at work etc...

And what other pictures Blitz ......do post them again too.....

Blitzkrieg wrote:

vader wrote:WTF!! I don't understand???
Where is the porn in a clothed woman? Nothing see through! Yes the clothing was tight but the that's all and all of them were dressed! So where is the porn?

Come on dude!! This is not Soft Porn!!!



And we do not stay in the Nanny State of the UK!!!

And what about this picture vader? Tell me that this is not soft porn?

Yes what about it???? That is suggestive not soft porn....

This is soft porn....

Are you for real?!

You seem to be in a state of denial that your posting of lady bits is perfectly okay. Grow up now. Really.

There is a certain section for that kind of stuff - Can't you just keep it there or do you get some kind of pleasure posting those pictures in topics unrelated?