2.0l bus transmission, R4.5k, Kimberley

Get your parts here
Forum rules
Post only parts for sale here, no vehicles.
Post Reply
User avatar
fig
Bus Driver
Posts: 12214
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:08 pm
What model do you have?: Type 2
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/258896479219/
Location: Where life is cheap and death is free
Has thanked: 287 times
Been thanked: 322 times
Contact:
South Africa

2.0l bus transmission, R4.5k, Kimberley

Post by fig »

http://www.gumtree.co.za/a-car-replacem ... 0888989309

Image

Kimberley. R4,500. Call Lee 0724687801
fig
Kaapse Kombi Kult

"Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right." -- Henry Ford
User avatar
retrovan
Donor
Donor
Posts: 8710
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 8:51 pm
What model do you have?: 52T1,68FB,72Bay,75FL
Location: Eich! no, in Jefferys Bay
Has thanked: 421 times
Been thanked: 541 times
Contact:
Netherlands

Re: 2.0l bus transmission, R4.5k, Kimberley

Post by retrovan »

The Bus experts please help me right........

The 2lt box is longer then the Beetle box ??

The drive shafts sit forward by approx. 15 mm.then the Beetle box.?

The total engine is 20 mm more to the rear, then the Beetle box ??...

Thanks for your help...

Herman
1952 Split Beetle 1835cc
1968 Fastback 2Lt.type4
1972 Low Light Bay Panel Van 2Lt type 4
1975 Fleetline Panel Van 1914cc
2020 MeFusco Beetle Truck 2Lt type 4
1972 FT Hahn SP 1776 cc
Dawie
Fuel Injection
Posts: 2114
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 10:25 pm
What model do you have?: Aircooled, various
Location: Kaapstadt
Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 208 times
South Africa

Re: 2.0l bus transmission, R4.5k, Kimberley

Post by Dawie »

The 2L 6-rib box was introduced starting with the 76 production year. Called "Type 091. Final drive is 4.57:1 and 4th 0.89.

Box type 002 in "three rib" and "5 rib pyramid shape" version each had different ratios and was used by 1600, 1700, and 1800 bay window.. Threerib 5.375:1 / 0.82 4th for 1600/1700 and 5-rib 4.86:1 /0.89 4th for 1800.

Both stronger than beetle box. Sometimes used in off-road applications like bajas and tube-frame specials.

When 72 Bay was redesigned to accept type 4 engines, the rear torsion tube was re-positioned and rear track widened to increase stability at higher cornering speeds. Think torsion tube could have been moved slightly forward in the process, and trailing arms lengthened, to have more space available for transmission. So not really a case of engine more rearwards, more like box more forwards i think. Exact position of shafts only matters in swing axle applications. Cv joints can efficiently and permanently run at angles.
Staying Aircooled is so much nicer.
Do'nt assume anything- (While doing fault-finding).
User avatar
retrovan
Donor
Donor
Posts: 8710
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 8:51 pm
What model do you have?: 52T1,68FB,72Bay,75FL
Location: Eich! no, in Jefferys Bay
Has thanked: 421 times
Been thanked: 541 times
Contact:
Netherlands

Re: 2.0l bus transmission, R4.5k, Kimberley

Post by retrovan »

Thanks Dawie,
The reason I ask, is should I fit a 2lt box to say a Split bus body such as say a Fleetline, would the engine be in the correct place or would it stick out towards the back.
This is what i have heard, and not sure if true. As the box cannot go more forward, will the engine have to move back, and by how much.

Thanks
Herman
1952 Split Beetle 1835cc
1968 Fastback 2Lt.type4
1972 Low Light Bay Panel Van 2Lt type 4
1975 Fleetline Panel Van 1914cc
2020 MeFusco Beetle Truck 2Lt type 4
1972 FT Hahn SP 1776 cc
User avatar
fig
Bus Driver
Posts: 12214
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:08 pm
What model do you have?: Type 2
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/258896479219/
Location: Where life is cheap and death is free
Has thanked: 287 times
Been thanked: 322 times
Contact:
South Africa

Re: 2.0l bus transmission, R4.5k, Kimberley

Post by fig »

retrovan wrote:Thanks Dawie,
The reason I ask, is should I fit a 2lt box to say a Split bus body such as say a Fleetline, would the engine be in the correct place or would it stick out towards the back.
This is what i have heard, and not sure if true. As the box cannot go more forward, will the engine have to move back, and by how much.

Thanks
Herman
Hi Herman. AFAIK, yes. Because the baywindow transmissions were longer than Beetle or split bus trannies, if you fit one the engine will stick out at the back. To do a seamless install, you would need to shift the rear torsion beam forwards (about 10cm IIRC), which obviously involves some serious cutting, realignment, fabrication and welding.
fig
Kaapse Kombi Kult

"Whether you think you can or whether you think you can't, you're right." -- Henry Ford
User avatar
retrovan
Donor
Donor
Posts: 8710
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 8:51 pm
What model do you have?: 52T1,68FB,72Bay,75FL
Location: Eich! no, in Jefferys Bay
Has thanked: 421 times
Been thanked: 541 times
Contact:
Netherlands

Re: 2.0l bus transmission, R4.5k, Kimberley

Post by retrovan »

Thanks Fig, that is what I heard, was not sure if it was fact.

Too much Work, too little reward.....

Herman
1952 Split Beetle 1835cc
1968 Fastback 2Lt.type4
1972 Low Light Bay Panel Van 2Lt type 4
1975 Fleetline Panel Van 1914cc
2020 MeFusco Beetle Truck 2Lt type 4
1972 FT Hahn SP 1776 cc
Post Reply